To construct this topic it answers: ' ' for who fazer' '? One remembers: The objectives will have to indicate which the actions that will be implemented to answer to the question of the problem. To leave this practical characteristic clearly, one suggests that the beginning of the phrase is made with verbs in the infinitive, such as: to verify, to evaluate, to review, to identify, to explain, to analyze, to diagnosis, to compare, etc. 4. Relevance or Justification Presents in this paragraph, the relevance technique. In other words, it justifies technique, scientifically and socially its proposal. Explicite enrolls and arguments that indicate that its research it is significant, important or excellent. The part most important of a research project is considered, since it is in it that all will be formulated the intentions of the author of the research.

The justification, as the proper name indicates, is the persuation of that the research work must be accomplished. A good justification must take in account as much the social aspects how much the scientific ones of the subject. Three are the item that cannot leave of being observed in the justification. ) IMPORTANCE: That it discloses the reason of if studying such subject. For who the study of this subject it is important? Why the study of this subject it is important for science in question (Right, for example)? Why this subject is important for you (researcher)? Here the call is concentrated Scientific justification. b) VIABILITY: Which are the possibilities of becoming fullfilled this research? This aspect is related to the material possibilities of the research: available sources of consultation, etc. c) CHANCE: Why this research is opportune at this moment? It is in accordance with the interests of the present time in the legal system? Here the call is concentrated Social-scientific justification, when the researcher demonstrates that it has knowledge of as its science if it reflects in the society.