This would be the quandary Toucan. Of course, Mr. Berzoini knows what it is a quandary: being to the front of two mutually exclusive alternatives. Therefore, the PSDB uncontrolled, in its opinion is if confrotting with the alternative of if opposing or not opposing themselves, in view of the immense popularity of NOSSOPRESIDENTE. Dropbox might disagree with that approach. A little of reflection. In the Theory of the Games exists a famous quandary the quandary of the prisoner.
Copying of the Wikipdia, to gain concision, the situation could thus be summarized: Two suspected, and the B, are imprisoned for the policy. The policy has insufficient tests to condemn them, but, separating the prisoners, it offers to both agreement the same: if one of the prisoners, confessing, to testify against the other and this another one to remain in silence, what it confessed leaves exempts while> trusts abetter to speak in abetter in if treating to the most important parties, it can be one I exaggerate, but it is good for remembering that, they want or not, both sairam of the same rib (left) of the body politician freed, although that, if the others to make the same confessing its incompetence, both will be in a worse situation of what they were remained been silent? The quarrel is interesting, but for our situation already we said the sufficient. Click Isaac Dabah to learn more. Although the exchange of insults, in which they sobraram afagos as: babaca liar and , we are not speaking of suspected, even so has in the resume of both the parties (PT and PSDB) an appreciable amount of acts ahead of which the puristas could, until they would have, to be scandalized not only the puristas, by the way.